Magnet can be a lifesaver
Read first-hand account of how Magnet hospitals save lives.
RNs gain support
The Magnet culture dictates fitting education into nurses' routine.
Understand Magnet nursing
Interim director discusses past and future of the Magnet program.
The Magnet difference
Experts discuss some of the unique characteristics of Magnet hospitals.
Seeking Magnet: Pros and cons
A look at some of the benefits and costs of pursuing Magnet status.
Improve patient care
Research suggests Magnet status can improve patient outcomes.
Nurses battle Hurricane Harvey
Nurses at Magnet hospitals in Houston stepped up during crisis.
Find your Magnet hospital
A breakdown by state of all the Magnet hospitals in the U.S.
Magnet recognition - Image of globe
Magnet has global appeal
Hospitals in other countries are seeking Magnet recognition.
Frontline nurses take the lead
Nurses are taking on leadership roles as Magnet Champions.
RNs are at the helm
Transformational leadership plays big role in Magnet process.
Free CE: Novice to expert
Build your expertise by adding to your skills and experience.
Achieve accreditation
Key steps hospitals can take to help them in the Magnet process.
Lifelong learning in nursing
Magnet program places a strong emphasis on continuing education.
Continuing education catalog
A look at courses that can help nurses on the Magnet journey.
continuing education catalog
It takes a special leader
Find out how transformational leadership leads to satisfaction.
APRNs and Magnet nursing
Magnet status can elevate nurse educational standards.
Achieve nursing excellence
Read stories of recent Magnet Nurses of the Year winners.
What being Magnet means
Learn about the continuing journey of the nation's first Magnet hospital.
When you get the Magnet call
Read testimonial from CNO of one of the newest Magnet hospitals.
Pursuing Magnet designation: Pros and cons
Magnet designation is considered the gold standard for many U.S. hospitals, but it’s not for everyone
Debra Anscombe Wood, RN
How to Navigate
Move forward or backward between articles by clicking the arrows.
Click or tap to bring up the Table of Contents.
Share articles by clicking on one of the social media icons in the upper right corner of the page.
Use your mouse wheel, keyboard arrow keys, or scroll bar to move up and down in an article.
Advertise with
© 2021 from Relias. All rights reserved.
1010 Sync Street
Morrisville, NC 27560
After more than two decades, Magnet® designation by the American Nurses Credentialing Center is considered the “gold standard” for nursing excellence at U.S. hospitals.
Still, achieving Magnet status can be a lengthy and costly process, and some hospital administrators wonder if it’s worth the time and effort. Magnet supporters, however, have little doubt about the merits of the program and believe the benefits of Magnet far outweigh the costs. “It’s central to our nursing culture,” said Cindy Sayre, PhD, RN, chief nursing officer at the
University of Washington Medical Center
in Seattle, which became the first Magnet hospital in the country in 1994 and has achieved redesignation six times. “There are many benefits.” The ANCC, which administers the Magnet program, considers several factors in determining if a facility meets the rigorous standards of Magnet designation, including the empowerment and autonomy of nurses; a collaborative work environment; nurse and patient satisfaction; nurse education and research; patient outcomes that exceed national benchmarks; and nursing-sensitive indicators that measure how nurses’ actions impact patient outcomes. A total of 545 U.S. hospitals and 14 hospitals outside the U.S. hold Magnet status. Rebecca Graystone, vice president of the Magnet Recognition Program and the Pathway to Excellence Program® at the ANCC in Silver Spring, Md., said organizations use Magnet standards as an evidence-based road map for excellence, serving as a framework for delivering nursing care. “Magnet status serves as a peer-reviewed credential,” Graystone said. “It is recognition for work they have done and are doing.”
Benefits to hospitals
Toby Marsh, MSN, RN, MSA, FACHE, NEA-BC, is chief nursing and patient care services officer for the
UC Davis Medical Center
, a Magnet hospital in Sacramento, Calif. Marsh sees no drawbacks to Magnet designation. “It shows we are at the top of our game as a medical center,” he said. “Magnet validates what we are doing in trying to retain our nurses and empowering them to be decision-makers.” Several studies have found Magnet recognition improves patient outcomes. The ANCC requires a certain percentage of nurse-sensitive quality outcomes, such as lower incidences of pressure injuries, to outperform national benchmarks. A 2017 study reported in the Journal of the American Heart Association found Magnet hospitals had lower fatalities and length of stay for patients with ischemic stroke. A 2015 study by researchers at the University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing reported significant improvements in nurse work environments and better patient outcomes in Magnet facilities when compared with non-Magnet facilities. A separate 2013 study by Penn Nursing found lower mortality rates and better patient outcomes at Magnet hospitals. Although some studies have shown improvements in work environments at Magnet hospitals, a 2010 study led by researchers at the University of Maryland School of Nursing in Baltimore found little difference in working conditions, such as schedules and job demands, reported by nurses in Magnet versus non-Magnet facilities.
Choose a different path
Some hospitals have chosen a different path than Magnet. While 95% of existing Magnet hospitals apply for redesignation, about 5% do not. Morton Plant Mease Health Care system in Florida was one of the exceptions. Morton Plant Mease was the first four-hospital health system in Florida to earn Magnet status in 2003. It was redesignated in 2008. Morton Plant Mease was a founding organization of BayCare Health System, Inc., which added additional hospitals over the years. Nursing leaders decided that rather than reapply for Magnet the health system should pursue Pathway to Excellence, another ANCC designation for healthcare facilities that they felt better aligned with BayCare. Pathway to Excellence focuses more on the nursing practice environment and less on research than does Magnet, and this was a major reason why BayCare decided to make the change, according to Lisa Johnson, MSN, RN, NEA-BC, senior vice president and CNO for
in Clearwater. “As a system, we are committed to nursing research, but with each hospital standing alone, that becomes challenging,” Johnson said. Johnson said she believes BayCare can better achieve its nursing goals through Pathway rather than Magnet. Magnet supporters, however, believe Magnet’s emphasis of research and evidence-based practice enhances nursing excellence and improves patient care. Sayre said the research component of Magnet engages nurses in finding solutions to problems, rather than simply identifying problems. She said the UW Medical Center considers every nurse a nurse researcher. “[Magnet] helps us keep advancing nursing practice,” Sayre said. “The research component is a great thing.” Sayre reported that many nurses seek work at her hospital because it is Magnet recognized. “It helps us attract the best registered nurses,” Sayre said. “They know for us to be Magnet we have to have structures and processes in place to support nursing practice.”
Cost vs. benefits
Cost is a factor for facilities considering Magnet. Application and appraisal fees are based on the size of the organization. Healthcare organizations must apply and then document evidence that they are meeting Magnet standards. An appraisal team will make an on-site assessment, talking to nurses, physicians and others, before the commission determines if the organization has met the Magnet standards. The application fee represents only a small portion of the cost associated with Magnet. It also takes a commitment of staff time to prepare the Magnet documentation and support shared governance and research. It takes hospitals an average of 4.25 years to complete the Magnet process, with an average total investment of $2.125 million, according to estimates cited in a 2014 study conducted by researchers at the University of Georgia and University of Colorado. Sayre acknowledged there are additional costs, staff time and documentation associated with achieving Magnet status, but believes the benefits outweigh the costs. “What is more costly is not having staff engaged in improving the patient experience or having suboptimal outcomes,” said Sayre, adding that being a Magnet hospital is “the right thing to do.” In their 2014 study, researchers from the University of Georgia and University of Colorado found that, despite the financial costs, achieving Magnet designation can help the bottom line in the long term. The study found hospitals receive an adjusted net increase in inpatient income of between $104.22 and $127.05 per discharge after achieving Magnet status and totaling more than $1.2 million in additional revenue annually. “Since Magnet Hospitals have better patient outcomes, we suspect that these increases in revenue reflect increased reimbursement rates from private insurers, relative to non-Magnet Hospitals,” said Richard C. Lindrooth, PhD, one of the researchers and an associate professor at the University of Colorado, in a news release by the Robert Woods Johnson Foundation, which funded the study. “That increased premium is related to the perceived higher quality of care and the desirability of including high-quality hospitals in insurers’ networks.” Graystone said sometimes the investment in Magnet cannot only be measured in dollars and cents, but in the satisfaction of staff and the quality of care that patients receive. “This is an investment in patients and nurses,” she said. “That’s the ultimate outcome; doing what’s right for patients and providing a work environment for the group of healthcare professionals who have the biggest outcome on care.”
Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe Now
Debra Anscombe Wood, RN, is a freelance writer.